Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 36
Filter
1.
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B ; 24(6): 463-484, 2023 Jun 15.
Article in English, Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20238798

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has continued to spread globally since late 2019, representing a formidable challenge to the world's healthcare systems, wreaking havoc, and spreading rapidly through human contact. With fever, fatigue, and a persistent dry cough being the hallmark symptoms, this disease threatened to destabilize the delicate balance of our global community. Rapid and accurate diagnosis of COVID-19 is a prerequisite for understanding the number of confirmed cases in the world or a region, and an important factor in epidemic assessment and the development of control measures. It also plays a crucial role in ensuring that patients receive the appropriate medical treatment, leading to optimal patient care. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) technology is currently the most mature method for detecting viral nucleic acids, but it has many drawbacks. Meanwhile, a variety of COVID-19 detection methods, including molecular biological diagnostic, immunodiagnostic, imaging, and artificial intelligence methods have been developed and applied in clinical practice to meet diverse scenarios and needs. These methods can help clinicians diagnose and treat COVID-19 patients. This review describes the variety of such methods used in China, providing an important reference in the field of the clinical diagnosis of COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , COVID-19 , Humans , China , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19 Testing
2.
Front Immunol ; 14: 1079960, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2288862

ABSTRACT

Objective: Vaccination is effective tool for preventing and controlling SARS-CoV-2 infections, and inactivated vaccines are the most widely used type of vaccine. In order to identify antibody-binding peptide epitopes that can distinguish between individuals who have been vaccinated and those who have been infected, this study aimed to compare the immune responses of vaccinated and infected individuals. Methods: SARS-CoV-2 peptide microarrays were used to assess the differences between 44 volunteers inoculated with the inactivated virus vaccine BBIBP-CorV and 61 patients who were infected with SARS-CoV-2. Clustered heatmaps were used to identify differences between the two groups in antibody responses to peptides such as M1, N24, S15, S64, S82, S104, and S115. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine whether a combined diagnosis with S15, S64, and S104 could effectively distinguish infected patients from vaccinated individuals. Results: Our findings showed that the specific antibody responses against S15, S64, and S104 peptides were stronger in vaccinators than in infected persons, while responses to M1, N24, S82, and S115 were weaker in asymptomatic patients than in symptomatic patients. Additionally, two peptides (N24 and S115) were found to correlate with the levels of neutralizing antibodies. Conclusion: Our results suggest that antibody profiles specific to SARS-CoV-2 can be used to distinguish between vaccinated individuals and those who are infected. The combined diagnosis with S15, S64, and S104 was found to be more effective in distinguishing infected patients from those who have been vaccinated than the diagnosis using individual peptides. Moreover, the specific antibody responses against the N24 and S115 peptides were found to be consistent with the changing trend of neutralizing antibodies.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , Antibodies, Viral , Vaccination , Antibodies, Neutralizing , Peptides
3.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 151(5): 1259-1268, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2286469

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Timely medical intervention in severe cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and better understanding of the disease's pathogenesis are essential for reducing mortality, but early classification of severe cases and its progression is challenging. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the levels of circulating phospholipid metabolites and their relationship with COVID-19 severity, as well as the potential role of phospholipids in disease progression. METHODS: We performed nontargeted lipidomic analysis of plasma samples (n = 150) collected from COVID-19 patients (n = 46) with 3 levels of disease severity, healthy individuals, and subjects with metabolic disease. RESULTS: Phospholipid metabolism was significantly altered in COVID-19 patients. Results of a panel of phosphatidylcholine (PC) and lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) and of phosphatidylethanolamine and lysophosphatidylethanolamine (LPE) ratios were significantly correlated with COVID-19 severity, in which 16 phospholipid ratios were shown to distinguish between patients with severe disease, mild disease, and healthy controls, 9 of which were at variance with those in subjects with metabolic disease. In particular, relatively lower ratios of circulating (PC16:1/22:6)/LPC 16:1 and (PE18:1/22:6)/LPE 18:1 were the most indicative of severe COVID-19. The elevation of levels of LPC 16:1 and LPE 18:1 contributed to the changes of related lipid ratios. An exploratory functional study of LPC 16:1 and LPE 18:1 demonstrated their ability in causing membrane perturbation, increased intracellular calcium, cytokines, and apoptosis in cellular models. CONCLUSION: Significant Lands cycle remodeling is present in patients with severe COVID-19, suggesting a potential utility of selective phospholipids with functional consequences in evaluating COVID-19's severity and pathogenesis.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Phospholipids , Humans , Phospholipids/metabolism , Lysophosphatidylcholines/metabolism
4.
Front Microbiol ; 14: 1122868, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2269338

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 pandemic is a global public health emergency. Despite extensive research, there are still few effective treatment options available today. Neutralizing-antibody-based treatments offer a broad range of applications, including the prevention and treatment of acute infectious diseases. Hundreds of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody studies are currently underway around the world, with some already in clinical applications. The development of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody opens up a new therapeutic option for COVID-19. We intend to review our current knowledge about antibodies targeting various regions (i.e., RBD regions, non-RBD regions, host cell targets, and cross-neutralizing antibodies), as well as the current scientific evidence for neutralizing-antibody-based treatments based on convalescent plasma therapy, intravenous immunoglobulin, monoclonal antibodies, and recombinant drugs. The functional evaluation of antibodies (i.e., in vitro or in vivo assays) is also discussed. Finally, some current issues in the field of neutralizing-antibody-based therapies are highlighted.

5.
The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology ; 2023.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-2236908

ABSTRACT

Graphical Background Timely medical interventions in severe cases of COVID-19 and better understanding of the pathogenesis are essential for reducing the mortality, but early classification of severe cases and its progression is challenging. Objective To investigate the levels of circulating phospholipid metabolites and their relationship with the severity of COVID-19 and the potential role of phospholipids in the progression of the disease. Methods In this study, we performed non-targeted lipidomic analysis of plasma samples (n=150) collected from COVID-19 patients (N=46) with three levels of severity, healthy individuals and subjects with metabolic diseases. Results Results showed that phospholipid metabolism was significantly altered in COVID-19 patients. A panel of phosphatidylcholine (PC) and lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) and of phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) and lysophosphatidylethanolamine (LPE) ratios were significantly correlated with the severity of COVID-19, in which 16 phospholipid ratios were shown to distinguish severe patients from mild cases and healthy controls, and 9 of which were at variance with those in subjects with metabolic diseases. In particular, relatively lower ratios of circulating (PC16:1/22:6)/LPC16:1 and (PE18:1/22:6)/LPE18:1 were the most indicative of severe COVID-19. The elevation of levels of LPC16:1 and LPE18:1 contributed to the changes of related lipid ratios. An exploratory functional study of LPC16:1 and LPE18:1 demonstrated their ability in causing membrane perturbation, increased intracellular calcium, cytokines, and apoptosis in cellular models. Conclusion These results demonstrate significant Lands cycle remodeling in patients with severe COVID-19, and suggest the potential utility of selective phospholipids with functional consequences in evaluating COVID-19 severity and its pathogenesis. Phospholipid ratio correlated with the severity of COVID-19, and the biological functions of phospholipid derivatives may be associated with exacerbation of the disease

6.
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol ; 2021 Sep 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2228859

ABSTRACT

In December 2019, the COVID-19 pandemic quickly spread throughout China and beyond, posing enormous global challenges. With prompt, vigorous, and coordinated control measures, mainland China contained the spread of the epidemic within two months and halted the epidemic in three months. Aggressive containment strategy, hierarchical management, rational reallocation of resources, efficient contact tracing, and voluntary cooperation of Chinese citizens contributed to the rapid and efficient control of the epidemic, thus promoting the rapid recovery of the Chinese economy. This review summarizes China's prevention and control strategies and other public health measures, which may provide a reference for the epidemic control in other countries.

7.
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol ; 2022 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2228858

ABSTRACT

The current COVID-19 global pandemic poses immense challenges to global health, largely due to the difficulty to detect infection in the early stages of the disease, as well as the current lack of effective antiviral therapy. Research and understanding of the human immune system can provide important theoretical and technical support for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19, the clinical implementations of which include immunoassays and immunotherapy, which play a crucial role in the fight against the pandemic. This review consolidates the current scientific evidence for immunoassay, which includes multiple methods of detecting antigen and antibody against SARS-CoV-2. We compared the characteristics, advantages and disadvantages, and clinical applications of these three detection techniques. In addition to detecting viral infections, knowledge on the body's immunity against the virus is desirable; thus, the immunotherapy-based neutralizing antibody (nAb) detection methods were discussed. We also gave a brief introduction to the new immunoassay technology such as biosensing. This was followed by an in-depth and extensive review on a variety of immunotherapy methods. It includes convalescent plasma therapy, neutralizing antibody-based treatments targeting different regions of SARS-CoV-2, immunotherapy targeted on the host cell including inhibiting the host cell receptor and cytokine storm, as well as cocktail antibodies, cross-neutralizing antibodies, and immunotherapy based on cross-reactivity between viral epitopes and autoepitopes and autoantibody. Despite the development of various immunological testing methods and antibody therapies, the current global situation of COVID-19 is still tense. We need more efficient detection methods and more reliable antibody therapies. The up-to-date knowledge on therapeutic strategies will likely help clinicians worldwide to protect patients from life-threatening viral infections.

8.
BMC Infect Dis ; 23(1): 53, 2023 Jan 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2214543

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) on mortality was preliminarily explored through the comparison of ACEIs/ARBs with non-ACEIs/ARBs in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Reaching a conclusion on whether previous ACEI/ARB treatment should be continued in view of the different ACE2 levels in the comparison groups was not unimpeachable. Therefore, this study aimed to further elucidate the effect of ACEI/ARB continuation on hospital mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in the same patient population. METHODS: We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Ovid, and Embase for relevant articles published between December 1, 2019 and April 30, 2022. Continuation of ACEI/ARB use after hospitalization due to COVID-19 was considered as an exposure and discontinuation of ACEI/ARB considered as a control. The primary outcome was hospital mortality, and the secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, rate of ICU admission, IMV, and other clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Seven observational studies and four randomized controlled trials involving 2823 patients were included. The pooled hospital mortality in the continuation group (13.04%, 158/1212) was significantly lower than that (22.15%, 278/1255) in the discontinuation group (risk ratio [RR] = 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.72; P = 0.001). Continuation of ACEI/ARB use was associated with lower rates of ICU admission (10.5% versus 16.2%, RR = 0.63; 95% CI 0.5-0.79; P < 0.0001) and IMV (8.2% versus 12.5%, RR = 0.62; 95% CI 0.46-0.83, P = 0.001). Nevertheless, the effect was mainly demonstrated in the observational study subgroup (P < 0.05). Continuing ACEI/ARB had no significant effect on 30-day mortality (P = 0.34), acute myocardial infarction (P = 0.08), heart failure (P = 0.82), and acute kidney injury after hospitalization (P = 0.98). CONCLUSION: Previous ACEI/ARB treatment could be continued since it was associated with lower hospital deaths, ICU admission, and IMV in patients with COVID-19, although the benefits of continuing use were mainly shown in observational studies. More evidence from multicenter RCTs are still needed to increase the robustness of the data. Trial registration PROSPERO (CRD42022341169). Registered 27 June 2022.


Subject(s)
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors , COVID-19 , Humans , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Renin-Angiotensin System , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Regression Analysis , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Observational Studies as Topic , Multicenter Studies as Topic
9.
Anal Chem ; 2023 Jan 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2185426

ABSTRACT

Serological assays are indispensable tools in public health. Presently deployed serological assays, however, largely overlook research progress made in the last two decades that jeopardizes the conceptual foundation of these assays, i.e., antibody (Ab) specificity. Challenges to traditional understanding of Ab specificity include Ab polyspecificity and most recently nonreproducible Ab-probe interactions (NRIs). Here, using SARS-CoV-2 and four common livestock viruses as a test bed, we developed a new serological platform that integrates recent understanding about Ab specificity. We first demonstrate that the response rate (RR) from a large-sized serum pool (∼100) is not affected by NRIs or by nonspecific Ab-probe interactions (NSIs), so RR can be incorporated into the diagnostic probe selection process. We subsequently used multiple probes (configured as a "protein peptide hybrid microarray", PPHM) to generate a digital microarray index (DMI) and finally demonstrated that DMI-based analysis yields an extremely robust probabilistic trend that enables accurate diagnosis of viral infection that overcomes multiple negative impacts exerted by NSI/NRI. Thus, our study with SARS-CoV-2 confirms that the PPHM-RR-DMI platform enables very rapid development of serological assays that outperform traditional assays (for both sensitivity and specificity) and supports that the platform is extendable to other viruses.

10.
ACS omega ; 7(42):37499-37508, 2022.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-2093167

ABSTRACT

Emerging infectious diseases have brought a huge impact on human society in recent years. The outbreak of Zika virus (ZIKV) in the Americas resulted in a large number of babies born with microcephaly. More seriously, the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) was globally spread and caused immeasurable damages. Thus, the monitoring of highly pathogenic viruses is important to prevent and control emerging infectious diseases. Herein, a dendritic polymer probe-amplified ECL-scan imaging system was constructed to realize trace analysis of viral emerging infectious diseases. A dendritic polymer probe was employed as the efficient signal emitter component that could generate an amplified ECL signal on the integrated chip, and the signal was detected by a single-photon level charge coupled device-based ECL-scan imaging system. With this strategy, the ZIKV in a complex system of blood, urine, and saliva was detected. The results indicated that a high sensitivity of 50 copies and superior specificity were achieved. Furthermore, this strategy realized highly sensitive detection (10 copies) of the S and N protein gene sequence of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov2) and spiked pseudovirus samples. Thus, the dendritic polymer probe-amplified ECL-scan imaging system suitably met the strict clinical requirements for trace analysis of an emerging virus, and thus has the potential to serve as a paradigm for monitoring emerging infectious diseases.

12.
Arch Microbiol ; 204(10): 622, 2022 Sep 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2027455

ABSTRACT

The sudden emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant is causing major global concern due to its high number of mutations compared to previous variants, which is a relatively rare but significant event that can change the course of viral evolution, the occurrence of which might have huge consequences for the natural evolution of species in general, prompting us to rethink our knowledge on evolution.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Mutation , SARS-CoV-2/genetics
13.
Int J Biol Sci ; 18(12): 4618-4628, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1954686

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to explore the clinical practice of phospholipid metabolic pathways in COVID-19. In this study, 48 COVID-19 patients and 17 healthy controls were included. Patients were divided into mild (n=40) and severe (n=8) according to their severity. Phospholipid metabolites, TCA circulating metabolites, eicosanoid metabolites, and closely associated enzymes and transfer proteins were detected in the plasma of all individuals using metabolomics and proteomics assays, respectively. 30 of the 33 metabolites found differed significantly (P<0.05) between patients and healthy controls (P<0.05), with D-dimmer significantly correlated with all of the lysophospholipid metabolites (LysoPE, LysoPC, LysoPI and LPA). In particular, we found that phosphatidylinositol (PI) and phosphatidylcholine (PC) could identify patients from healthy controls (AUC 0.771 and 0.745, respectively) and that the severity of the patients could be determined (AUC 0.663 and 0.809, respectively). The last measurement before discharge also revealed significant changes in both PI and PC. For the first time, our study explores the significance of the phospholipid metabolic system in COVID-19 patients. Based on molecular pathway mechanisms, three important phospholipid pathways related to Ceramide-Malate acid (Cer-SM), Lysophospholipid (LPs), and membrane function were established. Clinical values discovered included the role of Cer in maintaining the inflammatory internal environment, the modulation of procoagulant LPA by upstream fibrinolytic metabolites, and the role of PI and PC in predicting disease aggravation.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Disease Progression , Humans , Lysophospholipids , Metabolome , Metabolomics
14.
Front Immunol ; 13: 913732, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1933696

ABSTRACT

Levels of neutralizing antibodies (NAb) after vaccine against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can be detected using a variety of methods. A critical challenge is how to apply simple and accurate methods to assess vaccine effect. In a population inoculated with three doses of the inactivated Sinopharm/BBIBP vaccine, we assessed the performance of chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) in its implementation to detect severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) specific antibodies, as well as the antibody kinetics of healthcare workers throughout the course of vaccination. The antibody levels of NAb, the receptor-binding-domain (RBD) antibodies and IgG peaked one month after the second and remained at a relatively high level for over three months after the booster injection, while IgM and IgA levels remained consistently low throughout the course of vaccination. The production of high-level neutralizing antibodies is more likely when the inoculation interval between the first two doses is within the range of one to two months, and that between the first and booster dose is within 230 days. CLIA showed excellent consistency and correlation between NAb, RBD, and IgG antibodies with the cytopathic effect (CPE) conventional virus neutralization test (VNT). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that the optimal cut-off levels of NAb, RBD and IgG were 61.77 AU/ml, 37.86 AU/ml and 4.64 AU/ml, with sensitivity of 0.833, 0.796 and 0.944, and specificity of 0.768, 0.750 and 0.625, respectively, which can be utilized as reliable indicators of COVID-19 vaccination immunity detection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Viral Vaccines , Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Humans , Immunoglobulin G , Neutralization Tests , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccines, Inactivated
15.
J Med Virol ; 94(11): 5206-5216, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1925946

ABSTRACT

With the global prevalence of COVID-19 and the constant emergence of viral variants, boosters for COVID-19 vaccines to enhance antibody titers in human bodies will become an inevitable trend. However, there is a lack of data on antibody levels and the protective effects of booster injections. This study monitored and analyzed the antibody potency and the antibody responses induced by the booster injection in the subjects who received three vaccine doses. The study was conducted in a multicenter collaboration and recruited 360 healthy adults aged 20-74. Participants received the first, second, and booster doses of inactivated Sinopharm/BBIBP COVID-19 vaccine at 0, 1, and 7 months. Vaccine-induced virus-specific antibody levels (SARS-COV-2-IgA/IgM/IgG) were monitored at multiple time points, surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT), and the spatial distribution and proportion of immune cells and markers were analyzed using the CyTOF method before vaccination and a month after the second dose. The titers of SARS-CoV-2-IgA/IgM/IgG and neutralizing antibodies increased to a high level in the first month after receiving the second dose of vaccine and declined slowly after that. The antibody levels of SARS-CoV-2-IgG and sVNT were significantly increased at 0.5 months after the induction of the booster (p < 0.05). Despite a downward trend, the antibody levels were still high in the following 6 months. The B cell concentration (in humoral sample) a month after the second injection was significantly reduced compared to that before the vaccine injection (p < 0.05). The proportion of the C01 cell cluster was significantly decreased compared with that before vaccine injection (p < 0.05). Individual cell surface markers showed distinctions in spatial distribution but were not significantly different. This study has shown that serum antibody titer levels will decrease with time by monitoring and analyzing the antibody efficacy and the antibody reaction caused by the booster injection of healthy people who received the whole vaccination (completed three injections). Still, the significant peak of the antibody titer levels after booster highlights the recall immune response. It can maintain a high concentration of antibody levels for a long time, which signifies that the protection ability has been enhanced following the injection of booster immunization. Additionally, CyTOF data shows the active production of antibodies and the change in the immunity environment.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Vaccines , Adult , Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Humans , Immunoassay , Immunoglobulin A , Immunoglobulin G , Immunoglobulin M , SARS-CoV-2
16.
Emerg Microbes Infect ; 11(1): 1500-1507, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1864931

ABSTRACT

In vaccinees who were infected with SARS-CoV in 2003, we observed greater antibody responses against spike and nucleoprotein of both SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV after a single dosage of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. After receiving the second vaccination, antibodies against RBD of SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan, Beta, Delta, and recently emerged Omicron are significantly higher in SARS-CoV experienced vaccinees than in SARS-CoV naïve vaccinees. Neutralizing activities measured by authentic viruses and pseudoviruses of SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan, Beta, and Delta are greater in SARS-CoV experienced vaccinees. In contrast, only weak neutralizing activities against SARS-CoV-2 and variants were detected in SARS-CoV naïve vaccinees. By 6 months after the second vaccination, neutralizing activities were maintained at a relatively higher level in SARS-CoV experienced vaccinees but were undetectable in SARS-CoV naïve vaccinees. These findings suggested a great possibility of developing a universal vaccine by heterologous vaccination using spike antigens from different SARS-related coronaviruses.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , Antibody Formation , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Humans , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/genetics , Vaccination
17.
Allergy ; 77(8): 2404-2414, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1853589

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The inactivated Sinopharm/BBIBP COVID-19 vaccine has been widely used in the world and has joined the COVAX vaccine supply program for developing countries. It is also well adapted for usage in low- and middle-income nations due to their low storage requirements. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to report on the kinetics, durability, and neutralizing ability of the induced immunity of the BBIBP vaccine, and the intensified antibody response elicited by the booster. METHODS: A total of 353 healthy adult participants, aged 20-74 years, were recruited in this multicenter study. A standard dose of the BBIBP vaccine was administered (Month 0), followed by a second standard dose (Month 1), and a booster dose (after Month 7). Vaccine-induced virus-specific antibody levels (SARS-CoV-2-IgA/IgM/IgG), conventional virus neutralization test (cVNT), pseudovirus neutralization test (pVNT), and surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT) were monitored over multiple time points. RESULTS: Neutralizing titers induced by the two doses of inactivated vaccine for COVID-19 peaked at Month 2 and declined to 33.89% at Month 6. Following the booster dose, elevated levels of antibodies were induced for IgA, IgG, and neutralizing antibodies, with neutralizing titer reaching 13.2 times that of before the booster. CONCLUSION: By monitoring the antibody titer levels postvaccination, this study has shown that serum antibody levels will decrease over time, but a notable spike in antibody levels postbooster highlights the anamnestic immune response. This signifies that the protection capability has increased following the injection of booster immunization.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Adult , Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19/prevention & control , Humans , Immunity, Humoral , Immunization, Secondary , Immunoglobulin A , Immunoglobulin G , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination
18.
J Vis Exp ; (181)2022 03 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1786126

ABSTRACT

White blood cell (WBC) is an important indicator of inflammation in the body, and it can help distinguish between bacterial and viral infections. At present, most primary medical institutions in China have a poor percentage of adoption of blood-testing technology, and a hematology detection system with a high price to performance ratio and easy operation is urgently needed in primary healthcare centers. This paper introduces the principle and operation procedures of a point-of-care testing (POCT) card-based leukocyte analyzer (evaluated system), which was used to detect WBC indexes such as neutrophils, lymphocytes, and intermediate group cells (including eosinophils, basophils, and monocytes) in whole blood. The results from the evaluated system were compared to those from two commercial automatic hematology analyzers (reference system). The correlation and consistency between the evaluated system and the commercial reference systems were analyzed. The results showed that WBC count and number of granulocytes detected by the evaluated and reference systems showed a strong positive correlation (rs = 0.972 and 0.973, respectively), while the number of lymphocytes showed a relatively low correlation (rs = 0.851). A Bland-Altman plot showed that the major difference between the values detected by the evaluated system and the reference systems is within 95% limits of agreement (LoA), indicating that the two systems are in good agreement. In conclusion, the evaluated system has an excellent correlation, robust consistency, and a reliable comparison with the results of the widely used automatic hematology analyzers. It is ideal for WBC detection in primary medical institutions where a full-automatic five-category hematology analyzer is unavailable, especially during the COVID-19 normalized prevention and control period.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematology , Humans , Leukocyte Count , Leukocytes , Point-of-Care Testing , Reproducibility of Results
19.
Virol J ; 19(1): 49, 2022 03 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1745442

ABSTRACT

The newly identified Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has resulted in a global health emergency (COVID-19) because of its rapid spread and high mortality. Since the virus epidemic, many pathogenic mechanisms have been revealed, and virus-related vaccines have been successfully developed and applied in clinical practice. However, the pandemic is still developing, and new mutations are still emerging. Virus pathogenicity is closely related to the immune status of the host. As innate immunity is the body's first defense against viruses, understanding the inhibitory effect of SARS-CoV-2 on innate immunity is of great significance for determining the target of antiviral intervention. This review summarizes the molecular mechanism by which SARS-CoV-2 escapes the host immune system, including suppressing innate immune production and blocking adaptive immune priming. Here, on the one hand, we devoted ourselves to summarizing the combined action of innate immune cells, cytokines, and chemokines to fine-tune the outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the related immunopathogenesis. On the other hand, we focused on the effects of the SARS-CoV-2 on innate immunity, including enhancing viral adhesion, increasing the rate of virus invasion, inhibiting the transcription and translation of immune-related mRNA, increasing cellular mRNA degradation, and inhibiting protein transmembrane transport. This review on the underlying mechanism should provide theoretical support for developing future molecular targeted drugs against SARS-CoV-2. Nevertheless, SARS-CoV-2 is a completely new virus, and people's understanding of it is in the process of rapid growth, and various new studies are also being carried out. Although we strive to make our review as inclusive as possible, there may still be incompleteness.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Cytokines/metabolism , Humans , Immunity, Innate
20.
Front Immunol ; 13: 821218, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1690442

ABSTRACT

We analyzed the serum from COVID-19 patients and vaccinated subjects, and found that the specific IgA titer level could be used to assist COVID-19 diagnosis, especially in China.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19 Serological Testing/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , Immunoglobulin A/blood , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , China , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin M/blood
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL